BassBalsereit Studio (Symmetrical/Balanced) Upright Bass Pickup

balsereitLooks like it’s time to upgrade again. I’ve been very pleased with the Original (Passive) Balsereit Pickup, but now it looks like I can’t resist upgrading to the recently released BassBalsereit Studio Pickup. The “Studio” model connects via XLR and has a balanced symmetrical signal. It should work wonderfully with Acoustic Image heads which has two XLR capable channels, each with Balanced XLR inputs and Phantom Power. I will be sending the AKG C516 Mic through one channel and the BassBalsereit Studio into the other. I’ll keep a Rolls MP13 handy just in case I ever need to plug into someone else’s bass amp that only has  1/4″ inputs AND there is no mixer that I can plug into (the BassBalsereit Studio is designed to sound good directly into a mixer/PA).

I like the fact that they sound phenomenal, plus you can swap it between basses easily (using one pickup for 3 basses helps offset the expensive price). Should be a very good setup and I will post the results after some use.

Just like the original Balsereit Pickup, the pickup is conic and you can physically turn the pickup to get the most accurate sound out of your bass. Here are some clips that I found online at the GEBA Online site of someone who recorded a demonstration of the original Balsereit and the new Studio version.

Each repetition played is the pickup at different positions. The idea of tune-ability is that some positions sound great, some okay, while others are downright awful. While listening, keep this in mind.




Balsereit_studio_360 degree

Thank goodness for Google Translate. Here is a translation of the Balsereit technical overview:


The fully balanced development of the  BassBalserite Aktiv.
Typical applications: Professionals, studio recordings, small and large stages.

Significant improvements:

  • Extremely microphone-like, natural sound
  • Delicate, balanced sound image of the instrument
  • Sophisticated tone
  • Fat basses
  • Signal / noise ratio is less than -100 dB
  • Operation only with balanced inputs with phantom power
  • Output level of about 0 dB

The BassBalsereit Studio costs about $650 including shipping to the United States. Thomann carries these in stock.


NS Design CR4 Electric Upright Bass

I had sold my 5 String NS Design CR5M that I’ve had for over 5 years in favor of purchasing a CR4T. I use the NS Design Electric Double Bass very often for rehearsals or certain venues. Around here, cafes want jazz trios, but don’t have the room to spare for the acoustic upright since all three of us are put into tight corners. It’s come in handy for outdoor concerts since I don’t want to risk cracks or varnish damage to the acoustic bass, plus it is not temperamental in this environment. For rehearsals when I have to park my car far from my destination, having a compact bass that is easy to transport can make life as a bassist much easier. When I have to fly, this bass makes for a pleasant and cheaper flight (no oversize fees). It has become an indispensable option for me as a bassist. There’s only so much money I’m willing to spend on an Electric Upright Bass since I’ll never prefer one over an acoustic; so count out the spendy hollow bodied electric upright basses for me. I think that this is one of the better ones out there. It plays great and people really dig how it looks.

It sounds deep and punchy like a good upright bass, but it won’t replace the acoustic bass. Here’s the key; you should change from the provided strings (except the CR4T) to real upright bass strings. The strings that come on the CR and CRM models are terrible and will make your electric upright bass sound like fretless bass guitar. Still, the NS Design basses are definitely not for professional recordings, unless this specific type of sound is what you are looking for. It lacks the deep acoustic resonance, but it has a good quality tone when paired with the right strings. The lack of resonance is a plus where feedback would be a concern for the acoustic.

While I might not agree with a lot of the ideas Ned Steinberg has out there, I respect that he’s always pushing the envelope with creative ideas. The original incarnation, the CR4, was a leap forward in the electric upright bass world. With the collaboration of David Gage, this bass is what I consider the best in terms of an electric upright bass. Here’s what sets him apart from other electric upright bass makers; Ned Steinberg brings his wealth of knowledge of electric guitar and bass guitar construction, and David Gage brings his knowledge of upright bass setup, playability and amplification. The result is a upright bass that’s sounds great, plays wonderful and is as compact and durable as a bass guitar. He does seem to cater to bass guitar players a lot with features such as the magnetic pickup and reference dot markers on the fingerboard, and the fretted bass cello, but he is a successful businessman also so it makes sense for him to cater to a bigger market.

Durability and compactness is part of the design. The fingerboard is mounted flush with the body and the phenolic bridge is recessed, so there is nothing to catch or bump and break. Looking at it, it could probably be knocked onto its bridge without damage.

Playability is where this bass shines. It feels good and solid; the playability is a breeze. It feels natural for an upright bass player with its 41.5″ string length and angles of a regular upright bass are retained. Neck through thumb position it felt solid and easy to play. If you’re at least somewhat serious about the upright, I’d highly recommend this over their WAV series which is NS Design’s entry level product. The difference between the two is worth every penny. The WAV does not feel, play or sound as good, but you get what you pay for.

When I first purchased the CR5M, I just bought what they had in stock. This time I knew what I wanted different on my bass. Grasshopper and Beaver at Bass Central over in Florida and their distributor had assisted me with this new order. Yeah I’ll admit, when I was talking on the phone, I was picturing a grasshopper and beaver on the other end of the phone (too many cartoons growing up). They don’t know much about upright basses since they mainly deal with bass guitars, but their service is great. I ordered my previous CR5M from them years back and after price shopping they are still the lowest in price. I don’t see any benefit in paying more to buy one from an upright bass shop, since electric upright basses are really simple. I would never recommending buying a regular upright bass from anyone other than a upright bass dealer (and I’m selective when it comes to those dealers), but with this bass, it’s okay; save yourself a few hundred dollars.

Since NS Design has different flavors for their CR Basses, there was some confusion on my part about the differences between the models:

The number obviously means how many strings are on the bass. A CR5 has five strings versus a CR4, which has four. The ‘M’ in the CR5M and CR4M denotes that the magnetic pickup option is present in addition to the piezo pickup. If you chose a CR5 over a CR5M, you are getting the same bass, just that you opted not to have the magnetic pickups. The ‘T” model (i.e. CR4t & CR5T) is marketed as the “traditional”. The bass is the same as the regular piezo only model, except that it comes with the endpin stand instead of the tripod, the action is set higher, and there is a button on the back of the neck for reference of D on the G string, and it comes with Helicore Hybrids. Other than that, it’s the same in terms of electronics, appearance, construction, etc.

I chose to go from a 5 string back to 4 so that it is more consistent with my acoustic bass. I suppose I could get a 5 string acoustic, but good ones are hard to come by and the price reflects that. I never utilize that 5th string that much. At most, I went down to the D or Db, but the C and B were too slow and sounded inconsistent with other notes. These notes don’t ring or punch, they rumble with a slow attack rate. This isn’t a problem with the bass, it’s the problem that arises because of the low oscillating frequency of those low notes. The thicker string also means that the overtones are dampened, so the tone doesn’t cut through like it would with other strings. It came in handy for some more avant-garde or eclectic music, but for jazz it was more cumbersome in my mind than beneficial. It should make the transition between the two easier for me.

As far as the magnetic pickups, I always had those dialed out. I’d give them a try, but didn’t like the tone I was hearing. 100% piezo is far truer in tone to what most of us are used to. Even in considering the use of the magnetic for a unique type of tone, I still didn’t want to use it. It sounded like a cheap bass guitar. I doubt it’s a quality of components issue, since they use EMG’s which are reputable. The strings have to sit so far from the pickup, that I think that they are far from the optimum placement of the pickups’ magnetic field. Also, when using strings that are not steel core (gut or synthetic) or when playing arco, the magnetic pickups don’t work anyhow. I did try some Evah’s Pirazzi (synthetic core) strings on the bass and liked that sound and may end up using those instead of the Helicores anyhow. (Slight tangent: I did try Spirocore on it, and while they are perfect on my 100 year old German Upright Bass, they were to bright and harsh for the Electric Upright Bass). It didn’t make sense to spend the extra for the magnetics this time around. It should also make it easier to clean rosin off the bass after playing since the pickups tended to collect rosin and to clean it well you’d have to work at it with a q-tip.

I special ordered my bass without the dot markers, which is why it’s going to take months for me to get the new one. Dot markers along the fingerboard for every half step. Dot markers are a crutch and shouldn’t be used except by grade school students for the first few weeks of playing. It seems odd that NS Design puts dots standard on their bass and cello, but not violin and viola. Apparently there is a belief that bassists need the crutch permanently 😉 but if you accept that, then you’ll only live up to your own expectations. Most bassists I know ignore the dots anyhow, which is what I did, so I figured; why even have them?

There are other options like a zebrawood or burl walnut top which I had considered. I don’t know how the tone is affected, but I realized that I didn’t need a special looking electric upright bass, since and electric upright bass is already a rare sight.

My new electric upright bass is scheduled to arrive in August. There shouldn’t be much difference in quality or tone than I am already used to. I will do a full writeup anyhow when it comes in.

Korg DT-4 Tuner

My trusty 20 year old Korg DT-1 is on its last leg so it was time to go shopping for a new tuner. This tuner lasted me through a lot of rough handling in high school, college, and beyond. The fact that the Korg lasted as many years as it had me favoring another Korg tuner. Back in the 1980’s that tuner cost me about $100 if I recall right. The tuner never gave me any problems except that a few of the LED’s had stopped working over the years so I had to rely on my sense of pitch to substitute for the led’s that used to light up above Bb & Gb. It worked great until recently when I would have to hit it harder and harder to get it to start working. At that point, it was time to buy a new one.

When I was shopping for a new tuner, there were some features of the DT-1 that I wanted to have in my new tuner. Some of the features that I liked about the Korg DT-1 over other types of tuners was that it could be viewed low lighting situations. Back when it first was introduced, most tuners were the needle type which were fragile, due to the mechanical nature of them. Later I saw a lot of people using LCD tuners, but didn’t like them because they were hard to read in dark settings (even with the backlights). When you backlight something, you’re essentially looking its shadow, which isn’t as easy to read as a straightforward LED. The LCD simulated needle was also hard to read at a distance, because it was a thin line. The LCD’s also seemed slower and visually not very responsive to slight changes in pitch, but that could also be because those tuners were cheap.

The downside of the DT-1 was that the small LED’s got washed out outdoors. If I had to read it in that situation, I would have to cup the tuner so that the LED’s wouldn’t get washed out. Since the LED’s lit above an ink labeled letter for each of the 12 tones, it was also difficult to use in complete darkness since you wouldn’t know what note letter that the led was lit above. It was always accurate, reliable, and easy to use overall.

When I started shopping for the new tuner, I was drawn to the DT-4, which incorporated the same concepts but had a lot of improvements. A few revisions have passed since I purchased my DT-1 and it looks like Korg did not sit idle on their product. The DT-4 has larger and far brighter LED’s that were much harder to wash out in sunlight, it was even more compact, and it responded quickly just like the DT-1. The DT-4 also lights up the letter of the tone that you are playing so that you can use this in complete darkness. Best of all I was finding these at $30 at stores because of some heavy discounting out there. The tuner was very accurate and responsive to slight pitch changes, which allows for easy tuning. Since almost everyone has them now priced at more than 60% off, it’s a great time to try out the new Korg DT-4 tuner. I highly recommend it for use on our upright bass.

Link Added: Prochownik Bows

I’ve been a strong advocate of Z. Prochownik Bows for many years and think very highly of his work. I bought a bow from him over 10 years ago and it’s still my main bow for both Jazz, Solo Arco, and Orchestral styles. I’ve always liked it for its quality and value. Make no mistake about that statement, it is definitely a professional bow.

My style of arco may be different than yours, so your results with his bows may vary, but it suits mine perfectly. For those of you like me prefer a cellist style of bowing (no downward pressure on the bow, hand-weight only) you’ll find that Z. Prochownik’s bows work perfectly. Balance is ideal as is its ability to effortlessly draw a quality, large sound from a bass. It is a responsive bow that plays by finesse rather than strength. I tend to put lighter than average tension on my bows and for me, volume is achieved by lateral placement of the bow on string and bow speed instead. It’s not wimpy, I can still dig down without overplaying when the tonal effect is needed, nor have I ever felt hampered or limited by the bow.

I should add a caveat; there are bassists that have tried my Z. Prochownik bow and it did not suit their style. If you like to romp and play with a large amount of downward pressure on bow and string, the bow may not suit you as well as an alternative.

The next time you are in the market for a professional caliber bow, be sure to give Mr Prochownik a call.